Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length


 Freedom of Speech

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

August 22, 2020, 11:33:56 am
Read 1700 times

Offline Leto Atreides II

  • Administrator
  • *****

  • 182

Freedom of Speech
« on: August 22, 2020, 11:33:56 am »
Freedom of speech should, in general, be uninhibited, within reason; yelling "Fire!" in a crowded movie theater would be seen as an act, rather than a speech, deliberately calculated to produce a harmful reaction, and thus would be judged based upon its action and intent.

Pornography has nothing to do with freedom of speech. It does not convey ideas or expression. All it does is reduce women from human beings to items of merchandise, preying upon the weakness of males to subvert their most basic instincts and lure them away from real-world relationships and family-building into a sterile alternative that greatly increases the chances that they will perish from failure to reproduce. Before pornography existed, a man was compelled by his natural urges to seek out real women. Then porn was invented, and used to lure men away from reproductive activities. It's a clever weapon that presents itself as a viable alternative to a vital activity. Sort of like replacing real hamburgers with plastic ones, or oxygen with helium. Fills the same basic need, minus merely what you need to live.

It is a weapon of mass destruction and genocide. Its proponents only seek to protect it with "freedom of speech" to mock the very concept of freedom of speech itself, handing out "freedom of speech" awards to pornographers at the same time as they condemn any pro-White expression as "hate speech" to be suppressed.

Libel and slander, once expressed, may be prosecuted by its target or its target's supporters.